Training rhesus monkeys to perform the delayed matching-to-sample task on a touchscreen monitor

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33910/2687-1270-2021-2-4-443-454

Keywords:

rhesus monkeys, learning, working memory, delayed matching-to-sample task, touchscreen monitor

Abstract

The delayed matching-to-sample task (DMTS) is often used in animal working memory studies. In the classical DMTS paradigm, an animal is presented with a sample (three-dimensional object or image), and after some time—from seconds to minutes—with two stimuli, one of which is identical to the sample, while the other one is new. The animal gets reinforcement for choosing a stimulus identical to the sample. In non-human primate studies, researchers often use computerized versions of this test, with a touchscreen monitor for presenting stimuli and recording animal responses. However, these researchers do not normally discuss the process of teaching animals to perform this task on a touchscreen monitor, which is often a challenge for the experimenter. In this work, we describe the procedure for teaching rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) to perform the DMTS task, using a computerized setup with a touchscreen monitor for stimulus presentation (geometric shapes of different colours). To teach monkeys, we used a training version of the task, where the sample is not just replaced by stimuli for matching, but shifts in the direction of one of the positions of stimuli for matching. With this training version of the task, it took us only one experimental session to teach six male monkeys to perform the DMTS task with a moving stimulus. Furthermore, we gradually increased task complexity by increasing the number of samples simultaneously presented for memorisation. Five out of six monkeys learned the more complex version of the task with two samples and proceeded to performing the task with three samples. This procedure for teaching monkeys to perform the DMTS task with varying numbers of samples presented for memorisation will promote the use of sensor screens for this test instead of actual physical objects, which will expand the opportunities for cognitive research on monkeys.

References

Bondar, I. V., Vasileva, L. N., Tereshchenko, L. V. et al. (2019) Training of rhesus macaques to complex cognitive tasks. Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology, vol. 49, no. 8, pp. 996–1007. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-019-00829-6 (In English)

Camus, S., Ko, W. K. D., Pioli, E., Bezard, E. (2015) Why bother using non-human primate models of cognitive disorders in translational research? Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, vol. 124, pp. 123–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nlm.2015.06.012 (In English)

Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2010 on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes. Official Journal of the European Union, vol. L 276, pp. 33–79. [Online]. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv%3AOJ.L_.2010.276.01.0033.01.EN G&toc=OJ%3AL%3A2010%3A276%3ATOC (accessed 02.10.2021). (In English)

Goldman-Rakic, P. S., Lidow, M. S., Smiley, J. F., Williams, M. S. (1992) The anatomy of dopamine in monkey and human prefrontal cortex. In: A. H. Tuma, E. M. Stricker, S./ Gershon (eds.). Advances in Neuroscience and Schizophrenia. Vienna: Springer Publ., pp. 163–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-9211-5_8 (In English)

Hampson, R. E., Pons, T. P., Stanford, T. R., Deadwyler, S. A. (2004) Categorization in the monkey hippocampus: A possible mechanism for encoding information into memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 101, no. 9, pp. 3184–3189. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0400162101 (In English)

Hoffman, M. L., Beran, M. J., Washburn, D. A. (2009) Memory for “what”, “where”, and “when” information in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Learning and Cognition, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 143–152. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013295 (In English)

Ivanova, L. E., Korzhanova, Z. N., Varovin, I. A. et al. (2016) Izuchenie vzaimodejstviya makak-rezusov s taktil’nymi monitorami pri nablyudenii nizkochastotnykh testovykh izobrazhenij [Studying the interaction of rhesus monkeys with the tactile monitors during their observation of low-frequency visual test images]. Rossiyskij fiziologicheskij zhurnal im. I. M. Sechenova — Russian Journal of Physiology, vol. 102, no. 8, pp. 931–939. (In Russian)

Kuznetsova, T. G., Golubeva, I. Yu. (2014) Sravnitel’nyj analiz vybora po obraztsu u primatov [Comparative analysis of matching-to-sample results among primates]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Seriya 12. Psihologiya. Sotsiologiya. Pedagogika — Vestnik of Saint-Petersburg University. Series 12. Psychology. Sociology. Education, no. 2, pp. 109–118. (In Russian)

Lind, J., Enquist, M., Ghirlanda, S. (2015) Animal memory: A review of delayed matching-to-sample data. Behavioural Processes, vol. 117, pp. 52–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2014.11.019 (In English)

Plagenhoef, M. R., Callahan, P. M., Beck, W. D. et al. (2021) Aged rhesus monkeys: Cognitive performance categorizations and preclinical drug testing. Neuropharmacology, vol. 187, article 108489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2021.108489 (In English)

Rodriguez, J. S., Paule, M. G. (2009) Working memory delayed response tasks in monkeys. In: Methods of Behavior Analysis in Neuroscience. 2nd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press/Taylor & Francis Publ. [Online]. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK5227/ (accessed 02.10.2021). (In English)

Ryan, A. M., Berman, R. F., Bauman, M. D. (2019) Bridging the species gap in translational research for neurodevelopmental disorders. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, vol. 165, article 106950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nlm.2018.10.006 (In English)

Taubert, J., Flessert, M., Liu, N., Ungerleider, L. G. (2019) Intranasal oxytocin selectively modulates the behavior of rhesus monkeys in an expression matching task. Scientific Reports, vol. 9, no. 1, article 15187. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-51422-3 (In English)

Velichkovskiy, B. B. (2015) Rabochaya pamyat’ cheloveka. Struktura i mekhanismy [Human working memory. Structure and mechanisms]. Moscow: Cogito Centre Publ., 247 p. (In Russian)

Weed, M. R., Taffe, M. A., Polis, I. et al. (1999) Performance norms for a rhesus monkey neuropsychological testing battery: Acquisition and long-term performance. Cognitive Brain Research, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 185–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-6410(99)00020-8 (In English)

Young, M. E., Ohm, D. T., Dumitriu, D. et al. (2014) Differential effects of aging on dendritic spines in visual cortex and prefrontal cortex of the rhesus monkey. Neuroscience, vol. 274, pp. 33–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.05.008 (In English)

Published

2022-03-16

Issue

Section

Experimental articles